Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Buddhism - Three Dimensions 2/6

I thank you for your interest in Buddhism and I do admire your substantial knowledge of the matter far beyond the general Khmer public. I prepare to post my response to you in CAMPRO, but I withdraw it back over the concerns that some people may feel that I go off line. Anyway, I repeat again, don't believe too much of what I have said here. I am also a learner and not sure myself if I know the matter clearly. Please enjoy my response below:


You asked 'What is the difference between Panna (Panha- in Khmer sound), Samadhi and Vipassana." My understanding is different from the order you put these words in the question. I know only "Sila, Samadhi and Panha" (please allow me to write in Khmer sound). The three elements are in that order of sequence. Sila is the pre-condition before people can perform Samadhi. And then, Samadhi helps develop Panha. Panha that is developed from Samadhi is the highest one as it can reach the enlightenment. It is called Bhavana Maya Panha. Other two levels of Panha cannot reach the enlightenment: Sutta Maya Panha (from learning) and Chenta Maya Panha (from the ability to create something new by deriving from your Sutta Maya Panha). These concepts are explained in the course I learnt. I do not invent it.


Samadhi represents either Samadhi Kamathan or the Samadhi stage. The first one is the action to perform Samadhi and the second one is the stage of deep concentration reached during the meditation performance. At the Samadhi stage, the performer can temporary disconnect him/herself from the outside world including his/her own body. This may call Nirvana as described in your paper.

Vipassana is a specific Samadhi Kamathan developed by Gautama, the Buddha. There are over 200 kinds of meditations (Samadhi Kamathan), in which Vipassana is one of them. Vipassana (vi = special, great, high; + passana = see) means simply "see it objectively as it is." So, Vipasana Kamathan and Vipassana Samadhi kamanathan all refer to Gautama style of meditation performance. It is known as the shortest way or the direct route towards the enlightenment.

Before closing, just share with you for joking but real. You perhaps know that sexual intercourse is also a kind of meditation. This concept is widely objected, criticized, blamed by everyone. This is perhaps similar to your story 'fish cannot accept that there is land - the world is only water." But consider why there is famous story about Bhrama and Omar Pakdivathei. Generally, people rarely experience a true sex, except the pleasure sex. Even though, one however agrees that at the peak excitement, we temporarily disconnect from mind. It finally align with the purpose of Samadhi which is to go beyond mind.

Please feel free to provide your feedback to that response. I want to learn more from you.

Sunday, August 8, 2010

Buddhism - Three dimensions 1/6

I am excited with your interest in Buddhism and the vast resources of knowledge on the topic in our group. I learn a lot from you and thank you for sharing. From your contribution and my knowledge, I try to put it into a structure. I found that our discussion centered well on philosophical and religious levels. However, it seems to me that we didn't touch the spiritual level yet.

The distinction of the three-level structure of Buddhism (philosophical, religious, and spiritual) would help us knowing what we are talking about and limit the confusion between different levels.

In the philosophical level, Chanthy, Sophal, Chanroeun, Leang and Mony make outstanding comments regarding what is the right teaching of Buddha and how it can be practiced in life, in our society. Other members make good questions about how it links to our daily life and economic development, including poverty reduction, conflict resolution, etc.

There are also many relevant complaints and frustrations about the degradation of Buddhist practice in Cambodia including recent Net Khai scandal. The discussion also covers the belief, fanaticism, the monk teaching and their practice, etc. These are the religious issues. At the religious level, Buddhism has it own set of principles and practice different from others. it has different groups or secs like Theravada, Mahayana, Dhammayut, Mahanikay, etc. In sum, it divides from one religion to another, from one group to another. These groups and sub-groups often conflict with each other. And it surprises us when we learn the fighting among religious group from time to time.

The spiritual level has no conflict, no boundary between religions, or group, sub-group of religion. Spiritual is universal. It connects one to another harmoniously, peacefully.


When Chanthy and Mony tell the famous story of a man stucks with an arrow in his chest, and conclude that he has to act now, or Chanty's words 'the Buddha is in yourself', there is question how to act now or to find Buddha in oneself. There are also common concerns about the accuracy of the Buddhist scripts. There will be no such a question at the spiritual level. Buddha gives the key to find the way to acquire the knowledge from your own experience. HE taught us 'don't believe or accept any dogma, teaching, words because it is said in the religious scripts, or said by an eminent person, you have to experience yourself what the truth is'. The key to get that truth is to practice Buddha technique of meditation called vipaassana. From that technique, you can experience yourself about anicca, samsara, and all illusion in our view (life). This experience or awareness or consciousness will change your life positively.

If you want to know all the truth go to the spiritual level. You will be independent from monks, monasteries, and other influences as you can practice Vipassana at home after you master its technique through a training from a qualified master. You won't need monastery or concern whose monk should you dealt with. You will enjoy your daily life like other people, but you are conscious of yourself gradually according to your level of practice. You will go to Pagoda, do religious ceremony like others, but at the different consciousness level. You will accumulate more loving kindness to people, your mind becomes clear, your decision will be sharp and efficient. You will have less conflicts in life and live happier - sure, you bring good deeds with you to the next life. It is easy and simple.


If you ask where to get training, please go to Phnom Trung Moan (BBang). After a 10-day course, you master the technique of Buddha meditation.

This is the first time I try to set the 3 levels of Buddhism and would like to learn from you if it is reasonable and useful.

Saturday, February 20, 2010

God's Garden

In following Tonka replied to his invitation to visit the Church, Donald replied with additional comment:

Dear Tonka,

I respect your decision. I have heard people who also worship both Buddha and Jesus Christ equally. I called those people - skillful traders. They are facing 2 Deities and not sure whom to believe in and decided to deal with both of them and hoping one of the 2 Deities is real and saving them when they leave this world. Those people don't have real faith in any of the Deities.

Lord Jesus said: "No one can serve two masters. Either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other." Matthew 6:24

Faith is trusting in what you can't see because of what you can see. Here's my zillion dollar question to you: Have you ever accepted Jesus Christ as your personal Savior?

V/r

Donald
=========
Tonka responded:

Dear Donald,

Thank you for additional comment and I read it with great interest. The first interest is my admiration of your development in spirituality. It reflects in your personal character as a charming, confident, nice, peaceful, and smart man. This personality attracts to me which is the basis of our friendship. Regardless their religion, faith or belief, people who develop well in spirituality are equally great. They contribute to a peaceful and friendly world.

Second, I can see your loving kindness towards me. This loving kindness develops only in people with good progress in spirituality. You care and concern about me. This is a lovely sentiment and I thank you again. With care, parents concern about the safety of their child, the same as you do to me (Satan, personal Savior). I am being moved along the line of your care and concern. I surrender myself to God guidance (again this is God Father as I mean). The road ahead will be from within. I don't have to rush, but ready to accept the flow. Resistance and denial are sin.

This world is the God's Garden. It is so beautiful with the variety of flowers that God plants all of them. As a son of God, I admire and appreciate them equally. I can not love rose and hate tulip. Right now, I am standing on the part of the Garden where God plants lotus. Is it my choice? No, I was brought in to that place by God. Despite the location I am standing, I do admire the rest of flowers equally. Next when God moves me to the part where there is Jasmine, I will move accordingly and keep admiring the rest of the flowers equally. Who knows? one day I might move to the part where you are standing now, if God brings me there. Again, even I will be there, I still look back and enjoy the rest of the flowers equally. All flowers are flowers of my God Father.

I do see your question, and your comments (Trader, Deities, Master, Devotion, Personal Savior, Faith, Trust) and I am sorry that I have no direct answer to it. Generally, I refrain myself from discussing about God, Deities, and the holy scriptures, but accept all fully.

Again thank you for the opportunity to share my internal life that I never did it before.

Have a good weekend,

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

Invitation to visit the Church

Dear Tonka,

Honestly, I truly believe the Upward land was sold by the work of Jesus Christ whom I prayed to. Because at this moment, I believe very few people would want to buy any real estate. I am not saying this to discourage you, but what I believe in what happened. I have a personal story that I'd like to share with you.

Back in summer of 2006, my wife and I went out to look for any good deal on houses, we found a house with a very good deal and signed a contract on the house. Our current house was not even put up for sale yet. We started to contact realtor and listed the house with in weeks. We knew the selling market was bad, but we didn't know it was that bad. The more we did research on the market the more we found more bad news about selling houses at the time. We knew we were in trouble and could end up with 2 mortgages. My wife was crying and we were on our knees and asked the Lord Jesus Christ for forgiveness of our past transgressions. We had to confess all of our wrongdoings to Him. One Sunday and out of nowhere a buyer came by and agreed to sign a contract. It was a buyer market, but she agreed to pay the full listing price which we expected her to bargain $30K-$40K lower. The average number of days that the house would sit on market back then was 75 days, our house was sold in 39 days. We knew our Lord Jesus Christ is the One working on this. I totally give Him all credits for selling our house and also the Upward land.

As you noticed, I mention in this email that I prayed to Jesus Christ not to God. I know Jesus Christ is God - the creator of the universe, but I want to clarify that when I say God, I meant Jesus Christ. Because you would say you also have your God but you may mean another deity.

Mr. Tonka, I know I asked you to visit my church before, but you refused. I respect your decision, this may be another work of Jesus Christ that made me testifying to you my personal experience with the Lord Jesus. I know you are a good man and also a good friend, I hate to see losing you to Satan when you leave this world.

Please give some thought about this and if you'd like to visit my church, please let me know.
V/r
Donald
===

Dear Donald,

I found your appeal very compassionate and I thank you so much for your kind regards. However, I want to continue to be liberal. Standing on Buddhism and embrace the rest of the faiths equally. In this respect, I do not plan to visit your church anytime soon since I do not have specific purpose at this time. As I told you so far that in 1990 I have participated in the worship in a church at the suburb of Rome. I joined with people for praying there and receiving all the bread and wine like everyone as I am also son of God. That attendance had specific purpose for worship, unlike the access many times to Vatican was for the visit during my stay in Rome. I do worship Lord Buddha and Lord Jesus Christ equally. Each time, I pray God, I mean God Father, our common source. Acknowledging that I am son of God is outside the boundary of Buddhism. It is my personal belief.

Again thank you so much for care of me,

Kind regards,/ Tonka

Saturday, February 13, 2010

The book 'L'ART DE VIVRE"

Cher Monsieur,

J'ai reçu ce matin le livre "L'ART DE VIVRE" et je vous en remercie infiniment. Je vais m'empresser de le lire et de mettre en pratique la méditation Vissapana enseignée par S.N. Goenka.

La première phrase qui figure sur la première page du livre est extraite de la Bible, Proverbes IV, 7* :

"Voici le commencent de la sagesse ; Acquiers la sagesse, et avec tout ce que tu possèdes, acquiers l'intelligence."

Je vous remercie beaucoup du beau cadeau que vous me faîtes.

J'espère que bientôt la neige qui a envahi votre ville fondra au soleil et que vous pourrez retrouver un rythme de vie normal.

Avec l'expression de mes sentiments les meilleurs.

Marie-Antoinette REVEIL
===
Chère Madame,

Je suis heureux que vous ayez reçu le livre et je vous remercie beaucoup pour votre confirmation. J'espère que vous la trouverez intéressante.

Le livre nous donne une différente manière de voir le monde. En changant la perception du monde, notre vie se changera en conséquence. Il nous encurage d'appliquer une pensée critique et la recherche de la vérité universelle dont nous puissions jouir de notre vie, vivre en paix et réduire d'attente.

Dans ce livre, l'auteur reproduit discours par Goenka pour les 10 jours de cours de méditation Vipassana. Ce cours vise à former les gens sur la technique de méditation découvert par Gautama le Budha, comme un moyen de l'amener à trouver la vérité universelle ou l'illumination. Une fois qu'il est universel, la vérité est pour tous et pas seulement pour Gautama seul. Les gens de tous horizons de vies viennent d'apprendre les techniques et les appliquer dans leur vie sans sacrifiant leur croyance initiale. Ils n'ont rien à perdre, mais à ajouter plus de valeur à leur vie. Enfin, ce livre n'est ni à propos du Budhism, ni aucune autre religion. Il presente seulement la solution de la vie humaine quotidienne. Elle apporte toute la sagesse dont voici la citation de la Bible comme vous l'avez mentionné.

Bonne lecture et bonne chance à vous,

Votre étudiant TA HANG

==
Dear Madam,

I am pleased that you have received the book and I thank you so much for your kind confirmation.

I hope you will find it interesting. The book challenges us with different way of viewing the world. The change of perception about the world, our life would change accordingly. It encurage us to have critical thinking and searching for universal truth from which we could enjoy our life, live peacefully and reduce sufferance.

In this book the author reproduces Goenka speeches for the 10-day Vipassana Meditation Course. This course trains people about the meditation technique dicovered by Gautama the Budha, as a mean to bring him to find the universal truth or the enlightenment. Once it is universal the truth is for everyone and not just for Gautama alone. People from every walk of lifes comes to learn the technical and apply it in their life without sacrifying thier original belief. They have nothing to lose but to add more value to thier lives.

Finally, this book is neither about Budhism nor any other religion. It discusses about the human daily life. It brings all the wisdom in here including the quote from the Bible as you have mentioned.

Enjoy your reading and all the best to you,

Your student TA HANG

Wednesday, September 2, 2009

The Buddha's First Discourse

The Buddha's First Discourse

The following article, condensed slightly for publication in the Newsletter, is by Patrick Given-Wilson, who is Regional Teacher for Australia and New Zealand and author of the summaries of Goenkaji’s Satipatthana Sutta discourses.

After his enlightenment, the Buddha gave his first discourse to the five friends who had accompanied him during most of his years of searching. It is called the Dhamma Cakkappavattana Sutta, the discourse that set in motion the wheel of Dhamma. It summarizes the Buddha’s entire teaching.

The sutta starts:

Ekam samayam bhagava Baranasiyam viharati Isipatane Migadaye.

The scene is set in Isipathana, a sacred place near Varanasi frequented by recluses, hermits and other saintly people. Within it, Migada was a deer park and sanctuary where no animal could be killed.

Tatra kho bhagava pañcavaggiye bhikkhu amantesi.

The discourse was given to his five former companions. They were a skeptical audience, believing that the Buddha had failed in his quest because he had given up fasting and physical austerities. As they saw him approach, they agreed to show him no special respect. Nevertheless they listened, impressed by his serenity and the glow on his face.

He declared to them that he had become a Buddha. And to overcome their doubts, he explained how he had achieved enlightenment.

Dveme, bhikkhave, anta pabbajitena na sevitabba. Katame dve?

Two extremes, bhikkhus, should not be practiced by one striving for liberation. What two?

… yo cayam kamesu kamasukhallikanuyogo hino gammo pothujjaniko anariyo anatthasamhito ...

… attachment and clinging to sensual pleasures, which is low, coarse, vulgar, unworthy, and profitless …

He decisively repudiates the path of sensual pleasures. No one can attain liberation from sensual pleasures by indulging in them. This would have been obvious to his audience. But his second statement would have seemed radical: a decisive repudiation of the ascetic path they had been practicing together.

… yo cayam attakilamathanuyogo dukkho anariyo anatthasamhito

… attachment to self-torture, which is painful, unworthy, and profitless.

He then describes the actual path he took, the Middle Path, and states the result:

Ete kho, bhikkhave, ubho ante anupagamma majjhima patipada tathagatena abhisambuddha cakkhukarani ñanakarani upasamaya abhiññaya sambodhaya nibbanaya samvattati

Between these extremes the Middle Path, realized by the Tathagata, gives vision, gives knowledge, and leads to calm, to insight, to enlightenment and to nibbana.

“Tathagata” was the term the Buddha used to describe himself. It means literally “thus gone,” or one who has walked the path of truth.

He describes this Middle Path as the Eightfold Noble Path:

Ariyo atthaṅgiko maggo, seyyathidam – samma ditthi samma saṅkappo samma vaca samma kammanto samma ajivo samma vayamo samma sati samma samadhi.

This Noble Eightfold Path, namely – right understanding, right thought, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness and right concentration.

At one level, this was nothing new. The practice of morality already existed in India. Deep samadhis were also practiced, and Gotama himself had practiced these in the past. Pañña was also understood and accepted at least at the intellectual level.

However, the path starts with samma ditthi, and the ditthi (understanding) must be samma (right). That means not only must it be understood, it must also be experienced. Something can only be understood properly if it is actually experienced; otherwise it remains a mere philosophy or view. Similarly, every step on the Noble Eightfold Path is preceded by the word samma: to be right, it has to be experienced.

He then states the keystone of his teaching, the Four Noble Truths. He describes each in turn:

Idam kho pana, bhikkhave, dukkham ariyasaccam: jatipi dukkha, jarapi dukkha, byadhipi dukkho, maranampi dukkham, appiyehi sampayogo dukkho, piyehi vippayogo dukkho, yampiccham na labhati tampi dukkham – samkhittena pañcupadanakkhandha dukkha.

This, bhikkhus, is the Noble Truth of Suffering: birth is suffering, aging is suffering, sickness is suffering, death is suffering, association with the unpleasant is suffering, dissociation from the pleasant is suffering, not to receive what one desires is suffering—in brief the five aggregates of clinging are suffering.

Again at a mundane level, much of this was familiar to his audience. But there was a widespread belief that beings of the highest celestial realms were immortal. And here he states that all birth is dukkha and ends with a comprehensive rejection of clinging to any kind of existence.

Working deep inside, he had realized that any clinging to anything in the field of mind and matter was dukkha, suffering. The truth of dukkha had to be accepted in every aspect of existence. Even the most pleasant, subtle, tranquil experience had to be accepted as dukkha because of its impermanence.

… dukkhasamudayam ariyasaccam: yayam tanha ponobbhavika nandiragasahagata tatratatrabhinandini, seyyathidam kamatanha, bhavatanha, vibhavatanha.

The Noble Truth of the Arising of Suffering is this craving, leading to rebirth, bound up with pleasure and desire, finding delight now here, now there, namely, craving for sense pleasure, craving for existence, and craving for annihilation.

The second Noble Truth is that suffering arises with tanha, craving. Sometimes samudayam is translated as “the cause” of dukkha, but more precisely it means “arising.” Dukkha, the agitation, starts as soon as craving, tanha, starts: they are simultaneous. This is experienced by a meditator at a subtle level. This craving is the actual problem that leads to rebirth, ponobbhavika.

He describes three types of craving, or tanha. The first is the craving for sensual pleasures, kamatanha. This can be easily understood, but eradicating it alone is not enough. The second is the craving for any kind of existence, bhavatanha. Even if someone is free of sensual pleasures, there is the craving for survival: “The ‘I’ must survive. No matter what happens to the world or to other beings, I must be there in whatever plane of existence, to witness it and see it continue. Even liberation is something that ‘I’ must experience, ‘I’ must enjoy.” This craving gives rise to further rebirths, and so the round of suffering continues. The third and final craving is the desire for annihilation, vibhavatanha. Even craving for the end of existence is still craving.

Idam kho pana, bhikkhave, dukkhanirodham ariyasaccam: yo tassayeva tanhaya asesaviraganirodho cago patinissaggo mutti analayo.

This, bhikkhus, is the Noble Truth of the Eradication of Suffering: it is the complete eradication of that very craving, giving it up, relinquishing it, the liberation and detachment from it.

This craving must be totally eradicated, so that no root is left. Elsewhere, in the Satipatthana Sutta, the Buddha describes in more detail how the eradication must be complete at every step of the mental process: in every part of the mind, at every sense door.

The fourth Noble Truth is the way to reach that goal, the Eightfold Noble Path.

… dukkhanirodhagamini patipada ariyasaccam: ayameva ariyo atthaṅgiko maggo, seyyathidam—samma ditthi, samma sankappo, samma vaca, samma kammanta, samma ajivo, samma vayamo, samma sati, samma samadhi.

The Noble Truth of the Path leading to the eradication of suffering is this Eightfold Path, namely right understanding, right thought, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, and right concentration

In essence, the four Noble Truths are very simple: accept the fact of suffering, understand how it arises, totally eradicate it, and so realize the path to its eradication. But the Buddha’s enlightenment was actually to experience it. He elaborated, saying that each Noble Truth has to be realized in three different ways. Each truth is not a reality unless it is witnessed, or experienced.

Idam dukkham ariyasaccam … pariññeyam…pariññatam.

This Noble Truth of suffering … is to be experienced fully … is experienced fully.

The fact of suffering, dukkha, had to first be accepted. But that was mere intellectual knowledge, merely a starting position. The second part was to understand the need to experience directly the entire field of dukkha—pariññeyam—because unless the entire field is experienced, there might be some aspect, some part of dukkha, still considered free from dukkha. However, this was still an intellectual decision. The third step was pariññatam—he had explored the entire field of dukkha only when he had gone beyond dukkha. So even in this first Noble Truth, all the Four Noble Truths are included.

Idam dukkham samudayam ariyasaccam … pahahatabbam … pahinam.

This Noble Truth of the arising of suffering … has to be eradicated … has been eradicated.

The same applies to the second Noble Truth, dukkha samudaya. Mere acceptance that craving is the cause of dukkha does not help. The craving has to be eradicated:pahahatabbam. But even this is insufficient. The third part must be completed—pahinam—tanha must actually be eradicated at the root level, so that not a trace is left. So the second Noble Truth also completes all the Four Noble Truths. If it is pahinam, totally eradicated, one is free from misery.

Idam dukkhanirodham ariyasaccam … sacchikatabbam … sacchikatam.

This Noble Truth of the eradication of suffering … has to be witnessed … has been witnessed.

The third Noble Truth is the stage where there is no more misery at all—the stage of nibbana. Mere acceptance that there is a stage beyond mind and matter is not enough. It has to be witnessed—sacchikatabbam. Then the third part is sacchikatam—it is witnessed. When that was witnessed, he became free of all misery. All the four Noble Truths are included.

Idam dukkhanirodhagamini patipada ariyasaccam … bhavetabbam … bhavitam.

This Noble Truth of the path leading to the eradication of suffering … has to be developed … has been developed.

The fourth Noble Truth is the path. Again it has to be experienced fully. Only then can it be said to have been completed. The first step is acceptance that this is the path. The second is the intellectual decision that it has to be developed, bhavetabbam. Both are necessary. But only actually covering the entire path—bhavitam—could liberate him, and by walking it he had accomplished the other three Noble Truths. So all four Noble Truths, when actually experienced, are each complete in themselves and contain all the others.

Therefore, unless each Noble Truth is worked out in three ways, and the four Noble Truths thus become a twelvefold Noble Truth, they cannot give the result of liberation from suffering. If someone merely accepted the truth that there is misery, that there is a cause of misery, that there is total eradication of misery and that there is a way to eradicate the misery, the acceptance would be no more than a philosophy—logical but otherwise no different from any other philosophy. It could not have liberated him.

… pubbe ananussutesu Dhammesu cakkhum udapadi, ñanam udapadi, pañña udapadi, vijja udapadi, aloko udapadi.

… I had never heard such Dhammas before: vision arose, knowledge arose, wisdom arose, understanding arose, light arose.

This is repeated for each part of each Noble Truth. These were truths, Dhammas that he had never heard before: pubbe ananusuttesu Dhammesu. When he actually experienced them: cakkhum udapadi, ñañam udapadi, pañña udapadi, vijja udapadi, aloko udapadi, vision arose, knowledge arose, wisdom arose, understanding arose, light arose. Each was his own direct realization.

The Buddha describes this path as dukkhanirodhagamini patipada, the path to the cessation of all misery. Elsewhere he describes the same path as vedananirodhagamini patipada, the path to the cessation of all sensations. This is because the path has to be experienced. The word used for experience in those days was vedana, which also means sensation. So pariññatam means that the entire field of vedana, sensation, has to be experienced. Elsewhere, he says, Yam kiñci vedayitam, tam dukkhasmin—every sensation is connected with dukkha, with misery. Even the most pleasant sensation has to be understood as dukkha because it is anicca. There is the danger of clinging to this impermanent experience and of generating tanha, craving, toward it. Unless all sensation is understood as misery, there might remain a delusion that some sensation really does give happiness.

Yavakivañca me, bhikkhave, imesu catusu ariyasaccesu evam tiparivattam dvadasakaram yathabhutam ñanadassanam na suvisuddham ahosi, neva tavaham, bhikkhave … ‘anuttaram sammasambodhim abhisambuddho’ti paccaññasim.

As long as my knowledge and insight into reality “as it is” was not pure in these three aspects, in these twelve ways, concerning the four Noble Truths, I did not claim to have realized matchless, supreme Enlightenment.

The Buddha describes his commitment to truth, the acceptance of reality “as it is,” yathabutha, at every stage—a commitment that underpinned his exploration and his practice. This led to ñana dassanam—knowledge with insight, and purification. This had been his method of investigation: he remained always with the reality “as it is,” without getting carried away by any philosophical belief, desire, speculation or imagination. Every meditator who wishes for enlightenment has to do the same.

Yato ca kho me, bhikkhave, imesu catusu ariyasaccesu evam tiparivattam dvadasakaram yathabhutam ñanadassanam suvisuddham ahosi, athaham, bhikkhave, ... ‘anuttaram sammasambodhim abhisambuddho’ti paccaññasim

But now that it was so purified, he declared that “the matchless supreme enlightenment,” anuttaram sammasambodhim abhisambuddho'ti, had been realized. It is an emphatic declaration of his enlightenment.

Then finally comes the statement of the result:

Ñanañca pana me dassanam udapadi – ‘akuppa me vimutti, ayamantima jati, natthidani punabbhavo’’’ti

Knowledge and insight arose in me: “Unshakable is my liberation. This is the last birth. There is no more birth for me now.”

This concluded the discourse, and the five companions were delighted. All their skepticism was gone.

Imasmiñca pana veyyakaranasmim bhaññamane ayasmato kondaññassa virajam vitamalam dhammacakkhum udapadi: ‘‘yam kiñci samudayadhammam, sabbam tam nirodhadhamma’’nti.

While this discourse was being given, the pure, stainless Eye of Dhamma arose in the Venerable Kondañña, that: “Whatever has the nature of arising, has the nature of ceasing.”

The Eye of Dhamma, dhammacakkhum, now arose in Kondañña, one of the five companions; that is, he experienced nibbana. He understood that whatever has the nature of arising also has the nature of passing away.

This was a turning point because the discourse set in motion the Wheel of Dhamma. After an unimaginably long period of preparing and developing his paramis, after successfully overcoming all obstacles to achieve enlightenment, the Buddha now had the capacity to teach others.

It must be understood that Kondañña did not become enlightened simply by listening to what the Buddha was teaching. Instead, as he heard the Buddha’s words, Kondañña would have started focusing inside. He would have followed the same path, observing the reality, yatha bhuta, “as it is,” arising and passing throughout the mind-matter structure. Continuing to observe, he could reach the stage of experiencing dukkha nirodha, total cessation.

Kondañña now worked vigorously and within a short time became fully liberated. He became known as “ Kondañña the Wise.”

Kondañña was the first of many who became liberated at that time. The path is the same for all, and we are fortunate that the technique is still available today. It is therefore incumbent on all meditators to make best use of this path, for their own liberation. It is a rare opportunity.

Friday, May 15, 2009

the khmer contribution

the khmer contribution
By Troy Harris
Full text follow this link
abstract

THESE NOTES reflect a twofold motive. My initial concern in taking up this study was to locate what, if any Brāhmano-sindhu-yogic cultural markers may have existed in early Cambodian society. Secondly, I wanted to know what, if any of these cultural markers might be traced (a) to the process of formation of Siamese-Thai culture in general, and (b) to the highly refined philosophy-based yogic technology of the Siamese-Khmer brāhman saint Guru Chod (1900-1988) in particular, mainly in the sense that the philo-ascetico-yogic components and principles discerned might signify the presence of pertinent self-referential archeological antecedents. I therefore needed to pay academic homage to the ancient Brāhmanical culture of the Khmer, on the supposition that familiarization with this overlooked epic would provide me with a given set of access tools for examining and harvesting the unexplored richness at the interstices of its tropic domains, generically cordoned as Brāhman, Bauddha and Yoga.

21.10.05 | Permalink